For the third way, we don’t copy the index data and just rebuild it? If so, this seems like the most direct way and is harder to go wrong. Do we let “subsequent mutations flow through” only after fully syncing the index?
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incremental index building for eventual consistency | 5 | 999 | November 28, 2017 | |
| Implementing indexing and filtering | 5 | 823 | November 28, 2017 | |
| How can I bypass the mutation stop while re-indexing? | 1 | 424 | November 7, 2021 | |
| Predicate mutations while moving predicates between groups | 9 | 1299 | April 30, 2021 | |
| Batch update returns non-indexed errors | 1 | 606 | September 15, 2020 |